The home of the future
I did some thinking about the ‘home of the future’. I began with a classic futurism technique of deciding upon two factors, then imagining each factor changing to different extremes, to generate ideas for four different futures, twenty years from now.
The factors I became interested in are equality, and infrastructure… So what will it be like in twenty years if things become more/less unequal, and infrastructure becomes more/ less centralised and reliable…
Scenario one: ‘Current Trends’… Less equality and better infrastructure
Government policies favour increasing accumulation of capital in fewer people’s hands, with neo-liberal economic ideas.
High tech industry is spurred on, with consolidation in services and supply chains as ‘winner takes all’ is the mantra (see Uber vs. Lyft, Google virtual monopoly etc).
The loss of jobs to technology isn’t managed well however. Inequality increases, and the gap between the rich and the poor continues to grow, with the hollowing out of the middle class. Unemployment is high. Despite the inequality, crime is kept in check through efficient policing.
Scenario two: ‘Bright Future’… More equality and better infrastructure
In response to popular pressure, and a recognition that equal societies have less violence etc. global economic rules change to decrease gap between the have’s and the have-nots. There is a ‘great levelling’: The 1% become the 51%, the distribution of wealth is dramatically widened.
Taxes are high, and government is fairly strong. Technology enables a very fluid jobs market, so the wage disparity between the current ‘developed’ and ‘developing’ world disappears. The man growing your coffee in Brazil demands the same wage as the man running the organic artisanal coffee shop.
Scenario three: ‘Localism’… More equality but worse infrastructure
Things level out but at the expense of investment in infrastructure and technology. Efficiency and productivity declines as things become less reliable and more chaotic. People naturally respond by becoming more self-sufficient, and localism flourishes. Security isn’t bad because there’s not much difference in wealth or opportunity anyway.
Scenario 4: ‘Collapse’… Inequality and bad infrastructure
Most places take on the feel of some dystopian society, with the rich living in gated communities, which provide security and private infrastructure for those that can afford it. The rest live in a fairly broken down society, without much service provision. Security is bad due to lack of policing and the unequal situation.
To be continued…